about his arrest immediately following his arrest violated his First Amendment rights. Amaya presents no authority to support his conclusional allegation that the failure to permit him to complain personally to the Chief of Police, the I.A.D., or the F.B.I.
Robert amaya law office free#
Richardson violated his First Amendment right to free speech by refusing to allow him to file a formal complaint with the Chief of Police, Internal Affairs Division (I.A.D.), or the F.B.I., then placing him in a one-man cell with a video camera pointed at him to retaliate against him and deter him from exercising his First Amendment rights. 07-10855 Amaya first renews his argument that Sgt. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. See In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation, 495 F.3d 191, 205 (5th Cir. We review the district court s dismissal de novo. § 1983 lawsuit against Arlington, Texas, Police Officer Sergeant Richardson. PER CURIAM:* Robert Rueal Amaya, now Texas prisoner # 264274, appeals the district court s dismissal, pursuant to FED. 4:04-CV-775 Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. NFN RICHARDSON, Sergeant, in individual and official capacities Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No.
Fulbruge III Clerk ROBERT RUEAL AMAYA Plaintiff-Appellant v.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No.
0 kommentar(er)
